First analysis of ‘pre-registered’ studies shows sharp rise in null findings

Sciencenature.comSince 1996

First analysis of ‘pre-registered’ studies shows sharp rise in null findings

Logging hypotheses and protocols before performing research seems to work as intended: to reduce publication bias for positive results.

Quick read

This Nature story reports that pre-registering study hypotheses and protocols leads to a marked increase in null results. Someone would visit to read evidence that pre-registration reduces publication bias and affects reported outcomes.

  • Pre-registration involves logging hypotheses and protocols before research
  • Analysis shows more studies report null findings after pre-registration
  • Pre-registration helps reduce publication bias for positive results

Reactions

No reactions yet. Record a short about this link and it shows up here, in Reels and in the community feed.

Is nature.com your site? Sign in to verify it and get a Verified badge, full stats and a link-back badge.

First analysis of ‘pre-registered’ studies shows sharp rise in null findings was shared on NexURLs by skilo on October 17, 2026, in Science.

More Science finds

All Science websites →

Where people went next

Nobody has added a next stop yet. Be the first.

Five finds like this, every morning

Five great websites every morning, picked by people and written up by AI. Free, and one click to stop.

Remember Me
Scroll to Top

More

📰 Latest Posts
📊 Community Stats
🟢 Online Now
👋 New Members
👥 Popular Groups